Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Where The Sock Really Goes


I still love the theory of time travel but unfortunately it will never happen.  And I have proof!  You have proof, you say?  Yes, it is in the absence of proof that verifies time travel is not possible.  If we were able to develop time travel in the future, wouldn't we have seen the proof by now?   The counter-argument to this proposal is time travel must be cloaked in a cloud of caution and secrecy.  To not effect us in this time, future travelers would have to visit the past in secrecy.  We would never know if we've been visited but there should still be clues though.  Little discrepancies left in plain view.  Such as the missing keys you could have sworn you left on the table but your future self came back, moved them, caused a brief hesitation in your routine to find them, which in turn prevented you from getting in a car accident that would have caused you great harm, and created a different reality.  So, the theory is, tangents would develop in the stream of time allowing two possibilities.  A world that clung to an unaltered flow of time and a world changed in an altered flow of time.  But, if a set course which allowed for a person to come back in time were to allow an alteration of set time and a flow of events, wouldn't there have been an alteration which deviated the allowance of the time travel itself?  In other words, if we change events in the past, with a visit from the future, that alters a current present, doesn't this prevent that same person from achieving the set point in time in the future that would have allowed a corrected course in a stream of events?  If time travel were possible (and we know its not because I say so) then we could only come in some passive setting such as a window into the past or future without the possibility of physical connection.  But this theory of "window" travel creates a fourth or fifth dimension of reality where we step outside reality and travel not in time but dimensions itself.  In other words, to defy physics and probability, the only answer would be to step outside of time itself and become a mere observer.  So, in my own way of thinking, time travel is not possible.  The best possibility would be the observation of time outside of time itself.  The creation of tangents of time variation created from visits within time from future or past points creates an unstable paradox that would theoretically create an unstable universe.  The answer lies outside of our reach within the current mode of thinking because we restrict ourselves to the basic reality of a set parameters as defined by physics.  We are barking up the wrong tree.  We can never travel within time in the physical sense but I do believe we could do it on the subconscious level.  And we can't really travel in time but rather observe it at the subconscious level at varying points within our own timeline.  Whatever we have physically lived through could be revisited or whatever we will live through could be seen before it happens as long as we do not leave our own timeline.  The parameters or limits of time observance are dependent upon the individual.  Mine would start upon my conception and end with my future death.  But those years are open to observation and passive interaction. I could not physically alter my life in anyway but I could observe any point of time that I've lived or will live.  But I would have to do it at a subconscious level.  But, that's just my theory and is constrained by rational thought and limited reasoning.  I do want to believe that time travel, in the physical form, is possible and would be awesome. And it would explain some missing socks that remain a mystery.  But time travel is only one explanation of where socks go.  My name is Rueuhy and I approve this blog.


No comments:

Post a Comment